Search for: "Cordis Corporation" Results 1 - 20 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2018, 4:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Cordis Corporation et. al. which vacated and remanded a lower court’s ruling that claims of patent infringement alleged by Israeli pharmaceutical firm Medinol were barred by the equitable defense of laches. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cordis Cordis Corporation appeals from the decision of theUnited States District Court for the Eastern District ofVirginia granting Abbott Laboratories’ motion to quashtwo subpoenas duces tecum issued pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 May 2018, 4:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Cordis Corporation et. al. which vacated and remanded a lower court’s ruling that claims of patent infringement alleged by Israeli pharmaceutical firm Medinol were barred by the equitable defense of laches. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:13 pm by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Cordis Corporation v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:43 am
’s patent infringement action against Cordis Corporation and Johnson & Johnson on the ground of laches following a five day bench trial on that issue. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 12:44 am
Global Patent Holdings, represented by Niro Scavone, lost an appeal at the CAFC.Elsewhere, in the stent wars, Cordis Corporation ("Cordis") appeals, and Boston Scientific Corporation and Scimed Life Systems, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:43 am
Plaintiff Marlyn Riley had a Cordis Corp. stent implanted in a coronary artery and, apparently, suffered a heart attack two years later when a blood clot formed at the site of the stent. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:50 am by Pilar G. Kraman
(“BSC”) brought four patent infringement actions against Johnson & Johnson Inc. and Cordis Corporation (“J&J”) seeking a judgment of invalidity for four coronary stent patents. [read post]
The plaintiffs brought 14 related state court products liability actions against medical device manufacturer, Cordis Corporation in the Superior Court for Alameda County, California. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 2:16 am
Cordis Corporation (February 1, 2007), the Federal Circuit held that the lower court erred in granting Voda leave to amend his complaint to add infringement claims based on foreign patents under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:15 am by Robert Schaffer
The district court refused the transfer based on notions of targeting the district for a benefit, according to a four-part test it adapted from In re Cordis Corp. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:39 am
Johnson & Johnson Inc. and Cordis Corp. [read post]